Which document must specify the accused's name or a reasonable description?

The correct answer is that a warrant of arrest must specify the accused's name or provide a reasonable description of the individual. A warrant of arrest is a legal document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes law enforcement to take the individual named in the warrant into custody. For a warrant to be valid and enforceable, it is crucial that it contains sufficient identifying information about the accused, which typically includes the person's name. In cases where the exact name is not known, a reasonable description must be provided to ensure that the right individual is apprehended.

This requirement is essential as it aligns with constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures, ensuring that law enforcement officials act within the bounds of the law and respecting the rights of individuals.

While citations, notices of appeal, and subpoenas serve their respective purposes in the legal system, they do not carry the same specific requirement for identifying the accused. A citation may reference the individual indirectly or may not need to contain a name at all, depending on the context. Notices of appeal are related to the appellate process and do not pertain to the identification of a person for the purpose of arrest. Subpoenas are used to compel a witness to appear in court or produce documents, and they also do not necessarily